Posted boot figures and the blind-to-seen multiple are the whole of a Teen Patti billing argument. Open the table rules and write the boot. Write whether seen bets are double the blind, or some other multiple the felt prints. Then open the hand history and add the debits on the contested hand. A boot of 10, a blind call of 20, and a seen call of 40 should appear as those amounts if that is what the table posted. A debit of 80 on a seen call, when the multiple says 40, is a discrepancy. A debit of 40, when you stayed blind and owed 20, is a discrepancy the other way.
Lay the posted prices on the history
This is a table-stakes check. Compare the posted schedule with the ledger of that hand. Count the boot once. Count each call at the blind or seen price that applied after you looked or did not. Raises, if the table doubled the level, should follow the same multiple at the new level. Rake, if it was taken from the pot, is not a personal debit on top of your call unless the history labels it that way. Separate those lines. A player who argues that the dealer was rude, or that the chat was hostile, has left the arithmetic. The charge is either the posted price or it is not.
The question is the chips, not the tone
Bring the two copies to support: the rules panel for that table, and the hand history with the stake column visible. Ask which debit does not match the boot or the multiple. If they match, the charge is the game you played, including a seen double you may have disliked. If they do not match, the unmatched line is the claim. Do not rewrite the boot from memory of the previous table. Live rooms change it. The history of this hand, against the prices posted for this table, is the comparison that resolves the number.